Pacifica is trying to make political decisions about Recreational Vehicles. As a long-time RV user from Arizona to Alaska, I’d like to add some facts to the discussion.
An RV can be delightful, but it is complicated. It is both a truck and a house, with the needs of both. Like a truck, it needs gas, oil, etc. Like a house, it has water, sewer, and electrical systems, but it must be serviced every few days, to fill water tanks, drain sewer tanks, charge batteries, and more.
Parking RVs around town is good, as long as they can be frequently connected to water, sewer and electricity. Plain parking spaces aren’t enough. Proper hookups could be installed in designated parking spots, but at a cost.
Pacifica already has a nice well-run RV park in Pacifica Manor. At minimal cost, the city could assist current RV users to park there, provided the park management agrees.
Or the city could assist a private business to build a new RV park with proper services. It would fill a current visitor-serving need, as our current RV park is often full. The city could even provide reduced-fee parking to selected RVs if desired.
Pacifica has some good choices. But creating an RV parking permit system to park improperly without services will solve nothing, and make things even worse.